View Single Post
      07-04-2011, 05:46 AM   #7
hks786
Major General
United Kingdom
2165
Rep
5,364
Posts

Drives: *
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by E90///M3` View Post
actually Haye has a reach advantage. He has a 27" reach while Klitschko's reach is listed at 26". The real problem in this particular case was the height. Klitschko had a 3" height advantage and a 1" reach DISadvantage. Meaning Haye had about 2" of extra room to try and punch in an upwards fashion or lunging fashion to even reach Klitcshko.

i thought it was a boring fight really... It seemed like Haye didn't want to throw! If Haye can't beat the younger one, what makes him think he's gonna beat the bigger and stronger Older brother? haha
I'm 100% sure Klitschko had the reach advantage. I'm sure it was 78in v 81in.

http://news.boxrec.com/news/2011/kli...point-analysis
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/9416390.stm
__________________
Appreciate 0