View Single Post
      12-18-2012, 02:31 PM   #196
kingofthedemo
Major
kingofthedemo's Avatar
223
Rep
1,100
Posts

Drives: BMW E90
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: USA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by schoy View Post
Nice try, but the analogy fails because the difference is one of intent. People drive faster than 65 mph because they want to get to point A to point B faster, not because they want to kill someone. The fact that traffic fatalities happen at higher speeds is an unintentional consequence. Hence, most, if not all, high-speed traffic fatalities are due to recklessness and gross negligence, not intent or willfulness (and the law makes a distinction).

While many gun-related deaths are due to accident, a not insignificant portion are the result of an intent to kill ... because that's what guns were designed for.

Plus, your statistic of 40,000 traffic fatalities is misleading. Compare (the number of traffic fatalities / hours spent driving) vs. (the number of civilian gun-related deaths / civilian hours spent firing guns), then get back to us with a meaningful statistic.

Really? Do you think that those 40,000 dead people give a shit about the intent of the the individual that caused their death? Either way 40,000 people die a year from traffic related accidents, and a lot of them are caused by wreck less driving and speeding!
__________________
MY PROGRESS LINK: http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=766852


''Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.''Ernest Hemingway
Appreciate 0