F30POST
F30POST
2012-2015 BMW 3-Series and 4-Series Forum
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
BMW 3-Series and 4-Series Forum (F30 / F32) | F30POST > BIMMERPOST Universal Forums > General BMW News and Cars Discussion > BMW Manual Transmissions Dying a Slow Death...
Extreme Powerhouse
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      07-05-2014, 08:43 AM   #45
Dog Face Pony Soldier
2006 TIME Person Of The Year
Dog Face Pony Soldier's Avatar
United_States
9720
Rep
6,445
Posts

Drives: M Sport 335i
Join Date: May 2013
Location: North Jersey

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2014 335i  [9.74]
Admittedly the last time I drove a car on-track with a conventional H shifter pattern was a Ferrari 355 Challenge years ago... But I drove a Z51-equipped C7 Corvette on the track a few weeks ago and the manual transmission felt slow and clumsy compared to the Porsche SMG and even my F30's ZF 8 speed.

I'm not sure I'll ever own a manual again.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      07-05-2014, 10:30 AM   #46
olinjohnston
Private First Class
olinjohnston's Avatar
7
Rep
100
Posts

Drives: 2014 428i & 1994 840Ci
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Orange County, CA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by glennQNYC View Post
Admittedly the last time I drove a car on-track with a conventional H shifter pattern was a Ferrari 355 Challenge years ago... But I drove a Z51-equipped C7 Corvette on the track a few weeks ago and the manual transmission felt slow and clumsy compared to the Porsche SMG and even my F30's ZF 8 speed.

I'm not sure I'll ever own a manual again.
I took a manual E92 328i on trade Thursday because the owner specifically wanted to replace it with an automatic, but nothing was wrong with the car otherwise...I actually enjoyed driving it across to pre-owned for the appraisal.

As you see, BMW is not the reason behind the decline of the stick shift.
Appreciate 0
      07-05-2014, 11:41 AM   #47
islandbimmer
First Lieutenant
15
Rep
346
Posts

Drives: 2007 e92 SG
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Victoria BC Canada

iTrader: (1)

not sure if it was touched on here , a reason I only bought MT BMW's is the failure rate on the autos , even Consumer Reports used to not recommend any BMW equipped with an auto . Hope they have sorted out the past issues . I have close to a million miles on Mt BMW's never touched a clutch or had any tranny issues, never even serviced them. Sadly the fade now of multi tasking, can't have a coffee while driving , is killing the MT . No longer is there an advantage in mpg's department either . Give BMW credit they are one of the last holdouts on the MT front just like the coffee cup holder LOL

R.I.P. MT you will be sadly missed. except by my shirts as my daily coffee will be made easier
Appreciate 0
      07-05-2014, 03:29 PM   #48
Chihuahua
Brigadier General
Chihuahua's Avatar
4011
Rep
3,171
Posts

Drives: E30 329iS, E65 Alpina B7
Join Date: May 2012
Location: ATL

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by islandbimmer View Post
not sure if it was touched on here , a reason I only bought MT BMW's is the failure rate on the autos , even Consumer Reports used to not recommend any BMW equipped with an auto . Hope they have sorted out the past issues . I have close to a million miles on Mt BMW's never touched a clutch or had any tranny issues, never even serviced them. Sadly the fade now of multi tasking, can't have a coffee while driving , is killing the MT . No longer is there an advantage in mpg's department either . Give BMW credit they are one of the last holdouts on the MT front just like the coffee cup holder LOL

R.I.P. MT you will be sadly missed. except by my shirts as my daily coffee will be made easier
Blame ZF, not BMW for most of those automatic transmission failures. In the quest for better fuel econonmy, ZF insists on stuffing more clutch packs into the same sized casing that used to house four and five forward gears. More gears inside of the same sized casing equals smaller clutch packs, and you can figure out the rest. ZF is not interested in a building a durable transmission. They're interested in building a money making transmission. I say blame ZF for 'most' of those failures because BMW was (is?) using GM autos in a few of its cars.

We also live in a world where people are getting increasingly impatient. Why take the time to learn to drive an MT when you can just put it in drive, click on some flappy paddles, and have a computer do the work for you? Driving an MT is a lot more fun and rewarding, but it takes time to learn and master that skill. I agree with you that it's sad, but it's just natural progression I suppose.
Appreciate 0
      07-05-2014, 04:29 PM   #49
olinjohnston
Private First Class
olinjohnston's Avatar
7
Rep
100
Posts

Drives: 2014 428i & 1994 840Ci
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Orange County, CA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle B View Post
I say blame ZF for 'most' of those failures because BMW was (is?) using GM autos in a few of its cars.
The GM ones are really no better. If other transmissions last longer it's because they require regular maintenance intervals. I bet most BMW transmission failures (barring programming issues) could be prevented with fluid/filter changes every 30k mi.
Appreciate 0
      07-05-2014, 04:59 PM   #50
Chihuahua
Brigadier General
Chihuahua's Avatar
4011
Rep
3,171
Posts

Drives: E30 329iS, E65 Alpina B7
Join Date: May 2012
Location: ATL

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by olinjohnston View Post
The GM ones are really no better. If other transmissions last longer it's because they require regular maintenance intervals. I bet most BMW transmission failures (barring programming issues) could be prevented with fluid/filter changes every 30k mi.
I'm not too familiar with GMs 6 speeds that BMW used in the 1er (and maybe other cars?) But I do know that the GM 5 speeds that were used in the E46s were a lot more robust than the comparable ZF units.

Agree with the regular service intervals. I love how ZF manufactured the 6HP19/26 and called for regular fluid changes between 48-72,000km, but as soon as BMW bolted it into one of their cars it magically never needed servicing.
Appreciate 1
      07-05-2014, 05:00 PM   #51
Dackelone
European Editor
Dackelone's Avatar
Germany
10511
Rep
22,992
Posts

Drives: N54 e82
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Bayern, Germany

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by olinjohnston View Post
The GM ones are really no better. If other transmissions last longer it's because they require regular maintenance intervals. I bet most BMW transmission failures (barring programming issues) could be prevented with fluid/filter changes every 30k mi.

You guys do know... that BMW says their ZF automatics(8AT's) do not require any maintenance. Problem is.... ZF who builds and designed the 8AT's says you should change the fluid every ~45K miles! So who do you trust knows more? My money is on ZF.
Appreciate 0
      07-05-2014, 05:03 PM   #52
Dalko43
Captain
172
Rep
894
Posts

Drives: 2011 Toyota 4Runner Trail
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Upstate NY

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by glennQNYC View Post
Admittedly the last time I drove a car on-track with a conventional H shifter pattern was a Ferrari 355 Challenge years ago... But I drove a Z51-equipped C7 Corvette on the track a few weeks ago and the manual transmission felt slow and clumsy compared to the Porsche SMG and even my F30's ZF 8 speed.

I'm not sure I'll ever own a manual again.
I think you meant porsche's version of DCT (called PDDK) not SMG, right? I believe they are different systems.

It's all about what the driver is looking for. If driver involvement and engagement are your priorities then manual is the way to go. If slightly faster shifts and slightly better fuel economy appeal to you then DCT may be more applicable.

The manual shifter is slower, and perhaps less refined, but that doesn't really factor in when people opt for that transmission. I think there are enough 3rd pedal purists on the market that the manual transmission will live on, though in decreasingly smaller numbers, so long as there is a need for a hydraulic transmission.

As soon as we convert to 100% electric motors, this whole conversation becomes a moot topic.
Appreciate 0
      07-05-2014, 05:57 PM   #53
Dog Face Pony Soldier
2006 TIME Person Of The Year
Dog Face Pony Soldier's Avatar
United_States
9720
Rep
6,445
Posts

Drives: M Sport 335i
Join Date: May 2013
Location: North Jersey

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2014 335i  [9.74]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dalko43
Quote:
Originally Posted by glennQNYC View Post
Admittedly the last time I drove a car on-track with a conventional H shifter pattern was a Ferrari 355 Challenge years ago... But I drove a Z51-equipped C7 Corvette on the track a few weeks ago and the manual transmission felt slow and clumsy compared to the Porsche SMG and even my F30's ZF 8 speed.

I'm not sure I'll ever own a manual again.
I think you meant porsche's version of DCT (called PDDK) not SMG, right? I believe they are different systems.

It's all about what the driver is looking for. If driver involvement and engagement are your priorities then manual is the way to go. If slightly faster shifts and slightly better fuel economy appeal to you then DCT may be more applicable.

The manual shifter is slower, and perhaps less refined, but that doesn't really factor in when people opt for that transmission. I think there are enough 3rd pedal purists on the market that the manual transmission will live on, though in decreasingly smaller numbers, so long as there is a need for a hydraulic transmission.

As soon as we convert to 100% electric motors, this whole conversation becomes a moot topic.
You got it. Brain fart I guess!
__________________
Appreciate 0
      07-05-2014, 06:30 PM   #54
Helltime
Private
2
Rep
80
Posts

Drives: 09 135i sport package
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Iowa

iTrader: (0)

Between the 2 bmw dealers in Minneapolis I have been to recently and the one here in Des Moines Iowa, I have not seen a single 3 or 4 series on the lot with manual trans. Every 320i and 328i has been automatic. They have flat out told me unless someone commits to buying and is willing to wait for it, they will not order one. That does not help the manual cause one bit....
__________________
2009 135i 6MT jb4, ER CP, Tial BOV, 7" VRSF FMIC, BMS DCI, BMS 91 Pump flash running 35% e85
09 G8 GT
05 GTI 1.8T 5spd
Appreciate 0
      07-06-2014, 07:59 PM   #55
Brewer Bill
New Member
2
Rep
15
Posts

Drives: 2013 135i
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Falls Church, VA

iTrader: (0)

I recently took a survey from BMW that started as a general satisfaction questionnaire, but quickly zeroed in on the fact that I had bought a manual. The rest of the survey was asking about the importance of 6MT in my purchase decision, likelihood of buying another manual, importance in future decision, etc. I made sure my feelings were well known on the topic including adding a comment in the open ended section that my future convertible purchase will not be a Z4 due to the lack of a manual option.
__________________
135i, Jet Black, Coral Red, M Sport, Premium, Tech, HK, active steering
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:16 AM.




f30post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST