The Obama Campaign

[scottwww]

Obama Campaign Theatrics

--Producer Phil writes

A Wall Street Journal writer has uncovered a hilarious and puzzling coincidence at 4 different Sen. Obama campaign speeches over the last few months, including the recent speech in Seattle.

Is it phoney, orchestrated campaign theatrics or is it merely physiological coincidence? You be the judge.

Sept. 8th, 2007--Sen. Obama in Santa Barbara, CA scroll ahead to 6:29
Jan. 8th, 2008--Sen. Obama in Hanover, NH
Feb. 4th, 2008--Sen. Obama in Hartford, CN scroll ahead to 6:05
Feb 8th, 2008 Sen. Obama encountered another fainter at his Key Arena speech in Seattle.

[e90im]

Phony, orchestrated campaign theatrics…hmmm…you mean like WMD and Iraq war?

People do faint at large gatherings. We would have to look closely at the data.

Group age, gender, outside temp, etc. Also look at medical history of 4 people that fainted.

Then, we make judgment.

[!Xoible]

obama should go to santa barbara in May so he catches bimmerfest

i wonder what he's gonna do in a 100% white beach town

[e90im]

He’ll roll in with 22” rims…

[scottwww]

Thanks to Essedarius Maiestas post #343
Feb. 17, 2008 - 11:01 PM EST

THIS JUST IN RE: HUSSEIN OBAMA!!!

WASHINGTON – The electrifying presidential campaign of Barack Obama faces a new challenge – a Minnesota man who claims he took cocaine in 1999 with the then-Illinois legislator and participated in homosexual acts with him.

When his story was ignored by the news media, Larry Sinclair made his case last month in a YouTube video, which has now been viewed more than a quarter-million times. And when it was still ignored by the media, Sinclair filed a suit in Minnesota District Court, alleging threats and intimidation by Obama's staff.

Sinclair, who says he is willing to submit to a polygraph test to validate his claims, will now get his chance – thanks to a website offering $10,000 for the right to record it and $100,000 to Sinclair if he passes.

"My motivation for making this public is my desire for a presidential candidate to be honest," Sinclair told WND by telephone. "I didn't want the sex thing to come out. But I think it is important for the candidate to be honest about his drug use as late as 1999."

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56626

[Los Angeles]

Originally Posted by e90im

He’ll roll in with 22” rims…

why would he roll in on 22'' in rims?

[e90im]

Originally Posted by Los Angeles

why would he roll in on 22'' in rims?

It was supposed to be a funny racial remark...Can we all just chill for a second?

[e90im]

Originally Posted by scottwww

Thanks to Essedarius Maiestas post #343
Feb. 17, 2008 - 11:01 PM EST

scotty, you've descended to your personal low. Stop this partisan crap.
We have endured 8 years of shameful presidency...how can we go wrong in 08?

Sometimes I wander about you…Are you a hired gun…”a blogiator”…..
Chill dude...”Mike The Fundie” is not even close and McCain is a paleontologist’s wet dream…

It’s time for the other group of crooks to take charge…No major changes are on the horizon.

[scottwww]

In November, if it's Barak Obama headlining the ticket for the Democrats, just write in "present" for your vote.

It's a good way to object to provisions in the election that you might otherwise support.

Go Hillary!

[imolazhp_ci]

frankly i wouldn't care if he was a cross dressing, coke snorting, homosexual pedophile. anyone but hillary.

[scottwww]

Originally Posted by imolazhp_ci

frankly i wouldn't care if he was a cross dressing, coke snorting, homosexual pedophile. anyone but hillary.

Do you support Obama, or do you just hate Hillary? Had any Obasms lately?

[imolazhp_ci]

Originally Posted by scottwww

Do you support Obama, or do you just hate Hillary? Had any Obasms lately?

i am a republican. i hate hillary. i don't particularly care for obama or mccain, however. if obama gets the democratic nomination i am undecided about who i'll vote for. conversely, if hillary gets the nomination, i will vote for ANYONE who has the greatest chance of beating her. totalitarian dictators aside, i'd rather have anyone than her.

[imolazhp_ci]

also, for clarification, it has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that she is a woman. some of the best leaders in history were women, meir, thatcher, etc. but i heard some rumblings on larry king that mccain is considering condoleeza as his VP, in which case i would vote for mccain, regardless of the democratic nominee. let's face it, neither obama, and even less so hillary, have very much tangible experience in politics, but rice and mccain have been in it for a long time and rice has a phenomenal resume in every sector shes been in. i mean c'mon, she basically runs the entire dept. at one of the best intl. relations schools in the entire world.

[BKsBimmer]

Seems our boy scotty is on another right wing tirade. More of the politics of fear devisiveness and disinformation ... only this time it's his own. Shame on you Scotty. Get off the tracks and just let the Obama train roll through, otherwise you migth get run over.

[scottwww]

Despite my contempt for Hillary Clinton, I am less fearful of her in the White House than of Barak Obama in the White House. Although what the Clintons did while they were there was not my cup o' tea, and it made our nation more vulnerable, at least we would not be plunging into unknown territory.

With Obama, what would we get?

With the strong possibility that John McCain will lose in the general election, we need to limit the amount of damage that could be done.

[scottwww]

Originally Posted by BKsBimmer

Seems our boy scotty is on another right wing tirade. More of the politics of fear devisiveness and disinformation ... only this time it's his own. Shame on you Scotty. Get off the tracks and just let the Obama train roll through, otherwise you migth get run over.

Are you suggesting that the two stories I had posted (Obama Campaign Theatrics and the one regarding Larry Sinclair post #343) are false?

I don't know what to make of them, other than the theatrics story looks like a compelling argument against a dishonest approach in the Obama campaign. I guess that is nothing new, but it should be exposed for what it is. Isn't his campaign being promoted by the media as inspiring? If there are such theatrics being used, what else is being done that is entirely disingenous?

[e90im]

Originally Posted by scottwww

Are you suggesting that the two stories I had posted (Obama Campaign Theatrics and the one regarding Larry Sinclair post #343) are false?

I don't know what to make of them, other than the theatrics story looks like a compelling argument against a dishonest approach in the Obama campaign. I guess that is nothing new, but it should be exposed for what it is. Isn't his campaign being promoted by the media as inspiring? If there are such theatrics being used, what else is being done that is entirely disingenous?

Stop this theatrical bullshit.
Where are WMD? Where is Osama been crashing planes into our buildings?
4 people faint and that’s news? It’s the dumbed down politics we are seeing. Irrelevant stuff.

Huckabee is gone. McCain is old. I have seen people his age, who once were masters of their skill, descend to laughable lows. He can’t do it unless he starts snorting coke on a daily basis. He will fall asleep with his finger on a red button.

[scottwww]

Originally Posted by e90im

Stop this theatrical bull...

Do you Believe that Barack Obama had Gay Sex and did drugs with Larry Sinclair?

I don't believe it or disbelieve it. Once the polygraph test results are in, then I will form an opinion.

[BKsBimmer]

Originally Posted by scottwww

Are you suggesting that the two stories I had posted and the one regarding Larry Sinclair are false?

I don't know what to make of them, other than the theatrics story looks like a compelling argument against a dishonest approach in the Obama campaign. I guess that is nothing new, but it should be exposed for what it is. Isn't his campaign being promoted by the media as inspiring? If there are such theatrics being used, what else is being done that is entirely disingenous?

C'mon Scotty. This is the politics of throw everything to the wall and see what sticks. You repubs have no trouble slingin the mud. Good try, but no luck so far...

[E82tt6]

What a dream that would be for bigot Republicans. GAY SEX?! OMG!

[scottwww]

Originally Posted by BKsBimmer

C'mon Scotty. This is the politics of throw everything to the wall and see what sticks. You repubs have no trouble slingin the mud. Good try, but no luck so far...

http://www.whitehouse.com/NewsCommen...rt=&NewsID=110

We're not ready to share all the details about our upcoming evening lie-detecting with Obama accuser Larry Sinclair, but there are a few things that we want to tell you – namely that we've agreed on a time and place to carry out our wager with Mr. Sinclair.

We're going to meet him on Tuesday, February 26th at an undisclosed location in New York City. We've picked a polygraph expert, too: a renowned expert who has been involved in quite a few high-profile cases who we're not going to name until the results are not only in, but have been verified by a second renowned expert.

Then, we'll post the results, the names of both polygraph experts, and other relevant information, along with video and pictures, here on Whitehouse.com. Since the outcome of the test will be vital interest to the voting public, our findings will be made available before the presidential primaries in Texas and Ohio slated for March 4. That's all for now, but check back for updates.

[BKsBimmer]

Originally Posted by scottwww

We're not ready to share all the details about our upcoming evening lie-detecting with Obama accuser Larry Sinclair, but there are a few things that we want to tell you – namely that we've agreed on a time and place to carry out our wager with Mr. Sinclair.

We're going to meet him on Tuesday, February 26th at an undisclosed location in New York City. We've picked a polygraph expert, too: a renowned expert who has been involved in quite a few high-profile cases who we're not going to name until the results are not only in, but have been verified by a second renowned expert.

Then, we'll post the results, the names of both polygraph experts, and other relevant information, along with video and pictures, here on Whitehouse.com. Since the outcome of the test will be vital interest to the voting public, our findings will be made available before the presidential primaries in Texas and Ohio slated for March 4. That's all for now, but check back for updates.

Hey Scotty did you notice the disclaimer on that site: We are not affilated or endorsed by the U.S. Government

Isn't Whitehouse.com affiliated with a porn site? You ought to be more careful about the smutt sites you visit on the internet. You never know who's "watching"